Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
This text of Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
RIMINI, ) ) v. ) Honorable Cronan ) Honorable Cave J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. ) ) Civil Action No. 21-cv-7209 (JPC)(SLC) ) ) ) )
Motion To Stay This Matter Or To Dismiss Without Prejudice For Lack Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Whichever Is Proper
Hearing Requested
1. I was notified today by telephone that this matter is being investigated by the Department of Labor, without limitation. 2. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that the Department of Labor review the whole record of this matter. See, Procedures for Handling Sarbanes-Oxley Matters. 3. Federal courts are deprived of subject matter jurisdiction in Sarbanes- Oxley matters and over issues therein until administrative remedies are exhausted. Daly v. Citigroup Inc., 939 F.3d 415, 427-428 (2d Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 1117, 206 L. Ed. 2d 185 (2020). 4. Respectfully, this Court must immediately either stay this matter pending the government investigation or dismiss this matter without prejudice because the matter and issues therein are administratively active at the Department of Labor. For these reasons, federal courts do not yet have jurisdiction, as explained by the Second Circuit in Daly, cert. denied. 5. I am filing the same motion in the Court of Appeals. Dated: January 13, 2022 Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Thomas Rimini Thomas Rimini Pro Se P.O. Box 391 Winchester, Massachusetts 01890 (617) 485-9100 Email:thomas_rimini@msn.com
shall file a letter by January 26, 2022 indicating whether they intend to file a brief opposing motion or are willing to stipulate to the dismissal of the case without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (— iho Z Date: January 19, 2022 JOHN P. CRONAN New York, New York United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Thomas Rimini, herby certify that today, January 13, 2022, I served a
copy of the foregoing upon the person identified below. P. Kramer Rice Steven Pearlman Eddie Young Mark Batten
c/o Proskauer 11 Times Sq. New York, NY 10036
/s/ Thomas Rimini Thomas Rimini
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rimini v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rimini-v-jp-morgan-chase-co-nysd-2022.