Rimes, David Lynn
This text of Rimes, David Lynn (Rimes, David Lynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-73,120-03
EX PARTE DAVID LYNN RIMES, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 26521 IN THE 86TH/ 422ND DISTRICT COURT FROM KAUFMAN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while
intoxicated and sentenced to forty-three years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed
his conviction. Rimes v. State, No. 05-08-01543-CR (Tex. App. – Dallas, October 15, 2009, no pet.).
Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
failed to preserve error by requesting an instruction to disregard erroneously-introduced evidence,
and failed to challenge the qualifications of the officer who performed the field sobriety tests on
Applicant. 2
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The
trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the
appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall first supplement the habeas record with the portions of the trial
transcripts relevant to Applicant’s claims. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions
of law as to whether the performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether
counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other
findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of
Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall
be obtained from this Court
Filed: October 15, 2014 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rimes, David Lynn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rimes-david-lynn-texcrimapp-2014.