Riley v. Van Amrange

New York Supreme Court

Riley v. Van Amrange

1 How. Pr. 41

DecidedDecember 15, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 41 (Riley v. Van Amrange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riley v. Van Amrange, 1 How. Pr. 41 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff ought to have noticed the pleas as frivolous. The judge also made a similar remark, as in the case of Barker vs. McBride, and hoped counsel would understand that it would be necessary to be ready at the commencement of the term, when the court was held at Rochester.

Lecision.—Motion granted on payment of costs of default, and subsequent proceedings and costs of opposing motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff ought to have noticed the pleas as frivolous. The judge also made a similar remark, as in the case of Barker vs. McBride, and hoped counsel would understand that it would be necessary to be ready at the commencement of the term, when the court was held at Rochester.

Lecision.—Motion granted on payment of costs of default, and subsequent proceedings and costs of opposing motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 How. Pr. 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-van-amrange-nysupct-1844.