Riley v. Stern

10 N.Y.S. 8, 23 Abb. N. Cas. 435, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2449
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedNovember 12, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 N.Y.S. 8 (Riley v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riley v. Stern, 10 N.Y.S. 8, 23 Abb. N. Cas. 435, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2449 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

McAdam, C. J.

The court may strike out parties, and add others. Code, § 723. The only limitation on the power is that a sole defendant cannot be stricken out, and another substituted in his place. Spence v. Griswold, 7 N. Y. Supp. 145; Davis v. Mayor, 14 N. Y. 506, 527; New York, etc., Assn. v. Remington, etc., Works, 89 N. Y. 22. Motion to strike out the names of Henry Stern granted on payment to his attorney of $10 costs, and application to join the name of Bernard Pasternak with those of the two remaining defendants granted, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rothschild v. Goldenberg
33 Misc. 646 (New York Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.Y.S. 8, 23 Abb. N. Cas. 435, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-stern-nynyccityct-1889.