Riley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Riley v. State

538 S.W.3d 374

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 30, 2018

DocketWD 79904

StatusPublished

This text of 538 S.W.3d 374 (Riley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riley v. State, 538 S.W.3d 374 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*375Irvin Gene Riley appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he argued that his trial counsel (Counsel) was ineffective for (1) presenting an alibi defense; (2) describing exculpatory evidence during his opening statement that he later failed to present; and (3) failing to inform Riley of an amended, more favorable, written plea offer. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

*375Irvin Gene Riley appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he argued that his trial counsel (Counsel) was ineffective for (1) presenting an alibi defense; (2) describing exculpatory evidence during his opening statement that he later failed to present; and (3) failing to inform Riley of an amended, more favorable, written plea offer. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 S.W.3d 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-state-moctapp-2018.