Riley v. State
538 S.W.3d 374
Opinion
*375Irvin Gene Riley appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he argued that his trial counsel (Counsel) was ineffective for (1) presenting an alibi defense; (2) describing exculpatory evidence during his opening statement that he later failed to present; and (3) failing to inform Riley of an amended, more favorable, written plea offer. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riley v. State, 538 S.W.3d 374 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
538 S.W.3d 374 (Riley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.