Riley v. State

622 So. 2d 94, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7659, 1993 WL 274420
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 1993·No. No. 92-03154·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. We re[95]*95mand, however, for correction of the scrivener’s error in the written judgment. The judgment should reflect the crime as a third, rather than second, degree felony.

Affirmed with scrivener’s error. instructions to correct

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riley v. State, 622 So. 2d 94, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7659, 1993 WL 274420 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

622 So. 2d 94 (Riley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017