Riley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Riley v. State

543 So. 2d 424, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2778, 1989 WL 51218

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 1989·No. No. 88-1434·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GOSHORN, Judge.

This is an appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The record of the sentencing hearing establishes that the trial judge orally announced he would not impose a public defender’s lien or any court costs. However, the judgment prepared for signature inadvertently checked certain boxes imposing these costs. The state concedes that this was done in error.

The judgment is affirmed except as to the provisions imposing a lien for the public defender services and court costs which provisions are stricken.

Affirmed as modified.

ORFINGER and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOSHORN, Judge.

This is an appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The record of the sentencing hearing establishes that the trial judge orally announced he would not impose a public defender’s lien or any court costs. However, the judgment prepared for signature inadvertently checked certain boxes imposing these costs. The state concedes that this was done in error.

The judgment is affirmed except as to the provisions imposing a lien for the public defender services and court costs which provisions are stricken.

Affirmed as modified.

ORFINGER and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Riley v. State, 543 So. 2d 424, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2778, 1989 WL 51218 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

543 So. 2d 424 (Riley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related