Riley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Riley v. State

543 So. 2d 424, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2778, 1989 WL 51218

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 18, 1989

DocketNo. 88-1434

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 543 So. 2d 424 (Riley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riley v. State, 543 So. 2d 424, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2778, 1989 WL 51218 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

GOSHORN, Judge.

This is an appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The record of the sentencing hearing establishes that the trial judge orally announced he would not impose a public defender’s lien or any court costs. However, the judgment prepared for signature inadvertently checked certain boxes imposing these costs. The state concedes that this was done in error.

The judgment is affirmed except as to the provisions imposing a lien for the public defender services and court costs which provisions are stricken.

Affirmed as modified.

ORFINGER and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI