Riley v. State

506 So. 2d 479, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1175, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8086
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 1987·No. No. 4-86-1385·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand to the trial court for the purpose of eliminating from the probation order any requirement that appellant pay restitution for property for which he was not charged with having removed from the burglarized van. Fresneda v. State, 347 So.2d 1021 (Fla.1977).

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riley v. State, 506 So. 2d 479, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1175, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8086 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

506 So. 2d 479 (Riley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McWilliams v. State
524 So. 2d 740 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)