Riley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Riley v. State

397 So. 2d 453, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19367

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 28, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1846

StatusPublished

This text of 397 So. 2d 453 (Riley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riley v. State, 397 So. 2d 453, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19367 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of defendant Riley’s Motion to Vacate his convictions and sentences entered pursuant to guilty pleas. We agree that defendant’s Motion to Vacate filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, challenging the effectiveness of his counsel, was insufficient as a matter of law. Morrison v. State, 283 So.2d 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). In light of our ruling, we need not address the other questions presented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of defendant Riley’s Motion to Vacate his convictions and sentences entered pursuant to guilty pleas. We agree that defendant’s Motion to Vacate filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, challenging the effectiveness of his counsel, was insufficient as a matter of law. Morrison v. State, 283 So.2d 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). In light of our ruling, we need not address the other questions presented.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

397 So. 2d 453, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack