Riley v. State

164 So. 924, 27 Ala. App. 678
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Riley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ala. App. 203
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 1935·No. 2 Div. 563.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

There were but two witnesses examined, one for the state and the defendant testifying in his own behalf. The state’s witness said defendant did, and the defendant said *679 he did not. The jury passed upon the question under a proper charge of the court.

There is no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riley v. State, 164 So. 924, 27 Ala. App. 678 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

164 So. 924 (Riley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.