Riley v. Singletary

712 So. 2d 427, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5903, 1998 WL 264803
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 27, 1998
DocketNo. 96-04799
StatusPublished

This text of 712 So. 2d 427 (Riley v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riley v. Singletary, 712 So. 2d 427, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5903, 1998 WL 264803 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Twenty years after his first degree murder conviction and life sentence were affirmed on direct appeal, Lukely Riley filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm the trial court’s order denying Riley’s petition because the grounds for relief asserted therein were cognizable either on direct appeal or during postjudgment proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Hardwick v. Dugger, 648 So.2d 100 (Fla.1994); State v. Broom, 523 So.2d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Broom
523 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Hardwick v. Dugger
648 So. 2d 100 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 So. 2d 427, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5903, 1998 WL 264803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1998.