Riley v. Marshall Habilitation Center

Missouri Court of Appeals

Riley v. Marshall Habilitation Center

196 S.W.3d 654, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2006 WL 1888723

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 11, 2006·No. No. WD 66182·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard L. Beaver appeals the judgment of the Miller County Circuit Court denying his motion to substitute and motion to enforce an attorney’s lien. He presents two points on appeal. First, he argues his motion to enforce attorney’s lien should be enforced pursuant to section 484.130, RSMo. Second, he argues Jonna Riley’s application for attorney’s fees should have been granted pursuant to section 536.087.1, RSMo. Mr. Beaver’s points are denied, and the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard L. Beaver appeals the judgment of the Miller County Circuit Court denying his motion to substitute and motion to enforce an attorney’s lien. He presents two points on appeal. First, he argues his motion to enforce attorney’s lien should be enforced pursuant to section 484.130, RSMo. Second, he argues Jonna Riley’s application for attorney’s fees should have been granted pursuant to section 536.087.1, RSMo. Mr. Beaver’s points are denied, and the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Riley v. Marshall Habilitation Center, 196 S.W.3d 654, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1063, 2006 WL 1888723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

196 S.W.3d 654 (Riley v. Marshall Habilitation Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.