Riley v. Howell

43 A.D.2d 843, 351 N.Y.S.2d 647, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5977
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 1974·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 1, [844]*8441973, affirmed, without costs. We do not construe the fifth decretal paragraph in the judgment as restraining plaintiffs, in any manner, from taking further ■ proper procedures for the termination of the employment of the defendant reverend, if they be so advised. Shapiro, Acting P. J., 'Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riley v. Howell, 43 A.D.2d 843, 351 N.Y.S.2d 647, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

43 A.D.2d 843 (Riley v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related