Riley v. Ellmaker
This text of 6 Whart. 545 (Riley v. Ellmaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The principles settled in the case of Gilder v. The Savings Institution, rule this case.' There is no fraud, accident, or mistake, alleged in the bill; and therefore the injunction is refused—the case not being within the jurisdiction of the court.
On the other point, we are of opinion that under the plain provisions of the act of 16th June, 1836, one judge of this court has no power to order an injunction in any instance. It can only be done by the court whilst sitting in bank, and then after notice of the motion.
Motion for injunction denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Whart. 545, 1841 Pa. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-ellmaker-pa-1841.