Riley v. Ellmaker

6 Whart. 545, 1841 Pa. LEXIS 65
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 1, 1841
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Whart. 545 (Riley v. Ellmaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riley v. Ellmaker, 6 Whart. 545, 1841 Pa. LEXIS 65 (Pa. 1841).

Opinion

Sergeant, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The principles settled in the case of Gilder v. The Savings Institution, rule this case.' There is no fraud, accident, or mistake, alleged in the bill; and therefore the injunction is refused—the case not being within the jurisdiction of the court.

On the other point, we are of opinion that under the plain provisions of the act of 16th June, 1836, one judge of this court has no power to order an injunction in any instance. It can only be done by the court whilst sitting in bank, and then after notice of the motion.

Motion for injunction denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Artman v. Giles
26 A. 668 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Whart. 545, 1841 Pa. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-ellmaker-pa-1841.