Riley v. Corbett

Supreme Court of Florida

Riley v. Corbett

190 So. 596, 139 Fla. 327, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1670

DecidedJuly 18, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 596 (Riley v. Corbett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riley v. Corbett, 190 So. 596, 139 Fla. 327, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1670 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This writ of error is to a final judgment in an action at law on a promissory note. There were two pleas to the declaration, viz.: (1) The note sued on was not the note of this defendant and (2) That he has heretofore discharged and settled plaintiff’s claim by payment. Evidence was taken and the trial court instructed the jury as to their verdict which was returned for the plaintiff and final judgment was entered.

We have examined the record and the briefs and find the judgment appealed from to be amply supported. No *328 question is presented on which an opinion would serve any useful purpose. The judgment is free from error and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur. Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This writ of error is to a final judgment in an action at law on a promissory note. There were two pleas to the declaration, viz.: (1) The note sued on was not the note of this defendant and (2) That he has heretofore discharged and settled plaintiff’s claim by payment. Evidence was taken and the trial court instructed the jury as to their verdict which was returned for the plaintiff and final judgment was entered.

We have examined the record and the briefs and find the judgment appealed from to be amply supported. No *328 question is presented on which an opinion would serve any useful purpose. The judgment is free from error and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur. Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 So. 596, 139 Fla. 327, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-corbett-fla-1939.