Riley v. City of New York

50 A.D.3d 344, 854 N.Y.S.2d 400
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 2008·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered November 16, 2006, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff tripped over the top edge of a cellar door that was slightly elevated above the sidewalk, and his own deposition testimony established that the accident occurred in daylight in an area that he traveled on a daily basis. Defendants’ motion established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on the ground that the alleged defect was trivial, did not constitute a trap or nuisance, and was not actionable as a matter of law (see Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976 [1997]; Martin v Lafayette Morrison Hous. Corp., 31 AD3d 300 [2006]). Flaintiff failed to raise a material issue of fact in opposition. Concur— Tom, J.E, Saxe, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riley v. City of New York, 50 A.D.3d 344, 854 N.Y.S.2d 400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

50 A.D.3d 344 (Riley v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savas v. 557 8th Ave. Corp.
2024 NY Slip Op 33651(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Charnov v. New York City Bd. of Educ.
2019 NY Slip Op 2453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Taveras v. City of New York
59 A.D.3d 178 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)