Riley v. Chris Kuehne, Jr.

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC DATE FILED:_ 9/5/2024 DAVID RILEY, Plaintiff, 1:23-cv-2237-MKV -against- CHRIS KUEHNE, JR., ORDER OF DISMISSAL Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is informed by Magistrate Judge Aaron that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by October 7, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: September 5, 2024 MARY ih vvskocrt New York, NY United States District Judge