Riley v. Camese

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 7, 1997·No. 96-30475·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30475 Summary Calendar

CARL BLAKE RILEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EDDIE CAMESE; AUDREY AGUSTUS, incorrectly identified as “Audrie Agustus”; ORBIN TINSON, incorrectly identified as “Orbin Tinsen,”

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CV-3679 - - - - - - - - - - March 28, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carl Riley, Louisiana prisoner #262968, appeals from the

district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint brought

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Riley contends that the district

court erred by dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm the

dismissal of Riley’s complaint for essentially the reasons

adopted by the district court. See Riley v. Camese, No. 94-3679

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-30475 - 2 -

(E.D. La. Apr. 8, 1996). Riley’s motion for the appointment of

counsel is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riley v. Camese, (5th Cir. 1997).

Riley v. Camese (Riley v. Camese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related