Riley v. Beverage Air

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 28, 2002
• Docket: 02-1037
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1037

KATHY I. RILEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BEVERAGE AIR, a division of Specialty Equipment Manufacturing Company,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-00-2267-8-24)

Submitted: June 18, 2002 Decided: June 28, 2002

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven M. Krause, LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN M. KRAUSE, P.A., Anderson, South Carolina; Mary C. McCormac, Clemson, South Carolina, for Appellant. S. Clay Keim, Jeffrey A. Lehrer, EDWARDS, BALLARD, BISHOP, CLARK, STURM & KEIM, P.A., Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kathy Riley appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment and dismissing her state privacy act and Family

and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) claims. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601-2654 (West

1999). We have reviewed the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Riley v. Beverage Air, No. CA-00-2267-8-24 (D.S.C.

Nov. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED