Riley v. Adams

Fourth Circuit

Riley v. Adams

196 F. App'x 151

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2006·No. 05-7902·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Riley, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We *152 have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riley v. Adams, No. 1:05-cv-00816-CMH (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Riley, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We *152 have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riley v. Adams, No. 1:05-cv-00816-CMH (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Riley v. Adams, 196 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

196 F. App'x 151 (Riley v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related