Riley v. Adams

Fourth Circuit

Riley v. Adams

196 F. App'x 151

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 28, 2006

Docket05-7902

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 F. App'x 151 (Riley v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riley v. Adams, 196 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Riley, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We *152 have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riley v. Adams, No. 1:05-cv-00816-CMH (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Riley, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We *152 have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riley v. Adams, No. 1:05-cv-00816-CMH (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 F. App'x 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-v-adams-ca4-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack