Riley, Michael Lynn

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 12, 2007
DocketWR-39,238-02
StatusPublished

This text of Riley, Michael Lynn (Riley, Michael Lynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riley, Michael Lynn, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



WR-39,238-02
EX PARTE MICHAEL LYNN RILEY
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

IN CAUSE NO. 12,101(B) FROM THE

402
ND DISTRICT COURT OF WOOD COUNTY

Per Curiam.

ORDER



This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 11.071, Section 5. Applicant asserts he is mentally retarded and cannot be executed.

Applicant's first conviction for capital murder was reversed by this Court. Riley v. State, 889 S.W.2d 290 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). After remand for a new trial a death sentence was again imposed by the trial court on September 6, 1995. We affirmed the conviction and sentence. Riley v. State, AP-72,229 (Tex. Crim. App. May 28, 1997). On April 1, 1998, applicant filed his initial application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.071. We denied relief. Ex parte Riley, WR-39,238-01 (Tex. Crim. App. December 16, 1998).

In this subsequent application, he alleged he is mentally retarded under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242 (2002), and may not be executed. We found his claim met the requirements of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 11.071, Section 5 for consideration of the claim and remanded the issue to the convicting court for resolution. The convicting court conducted a hearing, made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and has recommended that relief be denied.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that the findings of the convicting court are supported by the record and we adopt them as our own. Applicant has failed to show that he is mentally retarded and the relief sought by this application is denied. The previous order staying execution is dissolved.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2007.

Do Not Publish



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atkins v. Virginia
536 U.S. 304 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Riley v. State
889 S.W.2d 290 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Riley, Michael Lynn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riley-michael-lynn-texcrimapp-2007.