Riles v. State
683 So. 2d 552, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10631, 1996 WL 588528
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1996·No. No. 96-813·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order denying post-trial relief on the second and third grounds urged by appellant. We reverse as to the first ground, however, as the record attached to the order does not conclusively show that appellant was not misled by trial counsel.
Therefore, we remand with instructions that the court hold an evidentiary hearing related to the issue of whether appellant’s trial counsel affirmatively misled him as to the consequences of his plea regarding gain time and control release considerations.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riles v. State, 683 So. 2d 552, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10631, 1996 WL 588528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
683 So. 2d 552 (Riles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Crane
683 So. 2d 552 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)