Riles v. State

683 So. 2d 552, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10631, 1996 WL 588528
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 11, 1996
DocketNo. 96-813
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 683 So. 2d 552 (Riles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riles v. State, 683 So. 2d 552, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10631, 1996 WL 588528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying post-trial relief on the second and third grounds urged by appellant. We reverse as to the first ground, however, as the record attached to the order does not conclusively show that appellant was not misled by trial counsel.

Therefore, we remand with instructions that the court hold an evidentiary hearing related to the issue of whether appellant’s trial counsel affirmatively misled him as to the consequences of his plea regarding gain time and control release considerations.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Crane
683 So. 2d 552 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 So. 2d 552, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10631, 1996 WL 588528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riles-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.