Rikoon v. Two Boro Dress, Inc.

3 A.D.2d 864, 163 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5723
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rikoon v. Two Boro Dress, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 A.D.2d 783

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the appeal is from (1) so much of an order dated February 20, 1957 as provides that (a) the matter of the payment of the balance of the proceeds of sale together with costs and allowances, in the hands of the Referee, and (b) the issue of the lien, if any, of the United States Government, will be determined on the motion to confirm the Referee’s report, and (2) an order dated March 5, 1957 which on reargument adhered to the original decision. Order dated March 5, 1957 affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appeal from order dated February 20, 1957 dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rikoon v. Two Boro Dress, Inc., 3 A.D.2d 864, 163 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

3 A.D.2d 864 (Rikoon v. Two Boro Dress, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.