Rikoon v. Two Boro Dress, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rikoon v. Two Boro Dress, Inc.

3 A.D.2d 864, 163 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5723

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 864 (Rikoon v. Two Boro Dress, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rikoon v. Two Boro Dress, Inc., 3 A.D.2d 864, 163 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the appeal is from (1) so much of an order dated February 20, 1957 as provides that (a) the matter of the payment of the balance of the proceeds of sale together with costs and allowances, in the hands of the Referee, and (b) the issue of the lien, if any, of the United States Government, will be determined on the motion to confirm the Referee’s report, and (2) an order dated March 5, 1957 which on reargument adhered to the original decision. Order dated March 5, 1957 affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appeal from order dated February 20, 1957 dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the appeal is from (1) so much of an order dated February 20, 1957 as provides that (a) the matter of the payment of the balance of the proceeds of sale together with costs and allowances, in the hands of the Referee, and (b) the issue of the lien, if any, of the United States Government, will be determined on the motion to confirm the Referee’s report, and (2) an order dated March 5, 1957 which on reargument adhered to the original decision. Order dated March 5, 1957 affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appeal from order dated February 20, 1957 dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 864, 163 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rikoon-v-two-boro-dress-inc-nyappdiv-1957.