Rikoon v. K. & F. Construction Co.

216 A.D. 767

This text of 216 A.D. 767 (Rikoon v. K. & F. Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rikoon v. K. & F. Construction Co., 216 A.D. 767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Order granting plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings modified on the law and facts by providing that the defendant indemnity company be given leave to serve an amended answer within ten days, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Defendant indemnity company was not precluded from defending this action by the default of the contractor, and may attack the validity and the amount of the lien. (Aesehlimann v. Presbyterian Hospital, 165 N. Y. 296.) The denials by the defendant are insufficient. Defendant should have been given leave to amend. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aeschlimann v. . Presbyterian Hospital
59 N.E. 148 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.D. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rikoon-v-k-f-construction-co-nyappdiv-1926.