Riker v. Riker
92 A. 586, 83 N.J. Eq. 693, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 393
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the conn below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker. Bergen, Minuten, Xalisci-i, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Heppenhetmer, Williams — 13.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riker v. Riker, 92 A. 586, 83 N.J. Eq. 693, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 393 (N.J. 1914).
92 A. 586 (Riker v. Riker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bahr v. Cooper
58 A.2d 604 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)