Riker v. Riker
92 A. 586, 83 N.J. Eq. 693, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 393
This text of 92 A. 586 (Riker v. Riker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Riker v. Riker, 92 A. 586, 83 N.J. Eq. 693, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 393 (N.J. 1914).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the conn below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker. Bergen, Minuten, Xalisci-i, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Heppenhetmer, Williams — 13.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bahr v. Cooper
58 A.2d 604 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 A. 586, 83 N.J. Eq. 693, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riker-v-riker-nj-1914.