Riker v. Darke

4 Edw. Ch. 668
New York Court of Chancery·Decided January 21, 1846·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor :

It is conceded that the complainants, in virtue of the wife’s dower in the lands, cannot, on that ground, file a bill to partition the estate as between her and the heirs. But this bill does not proceed on that footing. It shows that the complainant is grantee of the legal estate of the defendant George Darke, as tenant by the curtesy initiate; and that is an estate or interest in land whereon a bill for partition may be filed.

The demurrer must be overruled, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riker v. Darke, 4 Edw. Ch. 668 (N.Y. 1846).

4 Edw. Ch. 668 (Riker v. Darke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bogert v. Bogert
1 Silv. Sup. 436 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
Tilton v. Vail
49 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)