Riker Operating Co. v. Martinique Restaurant, Inc.
This text of 266 A.D. 487 (Riker Operating Co. v. Martinique Restaurant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As defendant’s canopy, erected adjacent to plaintiff’s property and extending over the sidewalk from the building line to the curb, interferes with plaintiff’s easement of light and obstructs the view of plaintiff’s restaurant from prospective customers, we think that upon the evidence plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief directing its removal except between the hours of nine p. m. and four a. m. (Brown-Brand Realty Co., Inc., v. Saks & Co., 126 Misc. 336 [opinion by O’Malley, J.], affd. 218 App. Div. 827.)
The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and a judgment entered decreeing the removal of the canopy during the hours indicated.
Townley, TJntermyeb, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., concurs in result.
Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs, and judgment directed to be entered decreeing the removal of the canopy during the hours indicated in opinion. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 A.D. 487, 42 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riker-operating-co-v-martinique-restaurant-inc-nyappdiv-1943.