Rihoo, Nariman

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Rihoo, Nariman

DecidedMarch 21, 2007

DocketPD-1912-06

StatusPublished

This text of Rihoo, Nariman (Rihoo, Nariman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rihoo, Nariman, (Tex. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD 1912-06 NARIMAN RIHOO, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS COUNTY

PER CURIUM. KEASLER and hervey, jj., dissent.

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3, because the original petition is not accompanied by eleven (11) copies. The petition for discretionary review also violates Rule of Appellant Procedure 68.5 because the grounds and reasons for review are longer than fifteen (15) pages.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellant Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition must be filed in the

Page 2

Rihoo

Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty (30) days after the date of this order.

En banc.

Delivered: March 14, 2007

Do Not Publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI