Rigueiro v. State

919 So. 2d 688, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1160, 2006 WL 229810

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 2006·No. No. 4D04-3932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Eaddy v. State, 789 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

POLEN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rigueiro v. State, 919 So. 2d 688, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1160, 2006 WL 229810 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

919 So. 2d 688 (Rigueiro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.