Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rigsby v. State

Rigsby v. State

772 So. 2d 1, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8011, 2000 WL 839950
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 28, 2000
DocketNo. 2D00-423
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 772 So. 2d 1 (Rigsby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rigsby v. State, 772 So. 2d 1, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8011, 2000 WL 839950 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Rigsby appeals, under a single notice of appeal, the trial court’s summary denial, in separate orders, of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We have carefully considered both motions and find no reversible error in either of the trial court’s orders denying relief. We accordingly affirm as to both.

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eagle v. State
772 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
772 So. 2d 1, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8011, 2000 WL 839950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rigsby-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.