Rigsby v. State
772 So. 2d 1, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8011, 2000 WL 839950
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2000·No. No. 2D00-423·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Vincent Rigsby appeals, under a single notice of appeal, the trial court’s summary denial, in separate orders, of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We have carefully considered both motions and find no reversible error in either of the trial court’s orders denying relief. We accordingly affirm as to both.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rigsby v. State, 772 So. 2d 1, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8011, 2000 WL 839950 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
772 So. 2d 1 (Rigsby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eagle v. State
772 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)