Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rigsby v. State

Rigsby v. State

691 So. 2d 500, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1399, 1997 WL 71745
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 1997
DocketNo. 95-02104
StatusPublished

This text of 691 So. 2d 500 (Rigsby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rigsby v. State, 691 So. 2d 500, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1399, 1997 WL 71745 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.

Vincent Rigsby appeals from convictions of aggravated child abuse, child abuse, negligent treatment of a child, and aggravated battery with a weapon. We determine that none of his issues have merit except that pertaining to the conviction for negligent treatment of a child. See § 827.05, Fla. Stat. (1991). That section has been declared unconstitutionally vague by our supreme court. State v. Mincey, 672 So.2d 524 (Fla.1996). Therefore, we vacate that conviction and affirm in all other respects.

ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mincey
672 So. 2d 524 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 So. 2d 500, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1399, 1997 WL 71745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rigsby-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.