Rigot v. City of East Liverpool

96 Ohio St. (N.S.) 601
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 26, 1917
DocketNo. 15524
StatusPublished

This text of 96 Ohio St. (N.S.) 601 (Rigot v. City of East Liverpool) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rigot v. City of East Liverpool, 96 Ohio St. (N.S.) 601 (Ohio 1917).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed on authority of State, ex rel. Smith, v. Smith, 69 Ohio St., 196.

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Wanamaker, Newman, Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 Ohio St. (N.S.) 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rigot-v-city-of-east-liverpool-ohio-1917.