Rigot v. Bucci

239 So. 2d 29, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5699
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 22, 1970·No. No. 69-39·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the briefs, record, and oral argument, it is our opinion that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rigot v. Bucci, 239 So. 2d 29, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5699 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

239 So. 2d 29 (Rigot v. Bucci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rigot v. Bucci
245 So. 2d 51 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Verich v. Florida State Board of Architecture
239 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)