Rigoni v. Morton
This text of Rigoni v. Morton (Rigoni v. Morton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
CORINNE MARY RIGONI,
Plaintiff, No. 23-11482
v. Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds
ERRON MORTON,
Defendant. ___________________________________/
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS
Plaintiff Corinne Mary Rigoni brings this civil rights lawsuit against Defendant Erron Morton under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint also includes several state law claims under Michigan common law. Because the parties in this matter are non- diverse, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims so as to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4); Moor v. Cty. of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 716 (1973); Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309, 1315 (E.D. Mich. 1994). Thus, pursuant to § 1367(c), all of the state law claims in Plaintiff’s complaint, including those in Counts VI, VII, VIII, and IX, are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will retain jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s federal constitutional claims only. SO ORDERED. s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge
Dated: July 17, 2023 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on July 17, 2023, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Bartlett Case Manager
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rigoni v. Morton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rigoni-v-morton-mied-2023.