Rigoberto Mendez Carrillo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 26, 2017·No. 05-17-00672-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 26, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00672-CR

RIGOBERTO MENDEZ CARRILLO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-00405-M

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 24, 2017 motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. In the motion, he states there are a number of exhibits missing from the reporter’s record and that these exhibits are needed in order to complete his brief.

The reporter’s record was filed September 25, 2017. According to the reporter’s record, the State offered and the trial court admitted exhibits 1-8, 9, 10-21, and 24-41, all of which are on file at the Court. Nothing in the record indicates that exhibits marked 22 and 23 were offered or admitted. Thus, it appears that the reporter’s record on file in the Court is complete.

We GRANT appellant’s motion to the extent he requests additional time in which to file his brief. We ORDER appellant’s brief filed within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rigoberto Mendez Carrillo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Rigoberto Mendez Carrillo v. State (Rigoberto Mendez Carrillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.