Rigoberto Garcia v. State
This text of Rigoberto Garcia v. State (Rigoberto Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
RIGOBERTO GARCIA,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-3270
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 31, 2017
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Raul A. Zambrano, Judge.
Rigoberto Garcia, Bonifay, pro se
John S. Zaleskie, Jr., Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final order denying Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.850 amended motion for postconviction relief filed in circuit court Case No.
2012- 000451-CFAWS, but we do so without prejudice to Appellant seeking postconviction relief in circuit court Case Nos. 2012-002927-CFAWS, 2012-000312-
CFAWS, 2012-002998-CFAWS, 2012-002945-CFAWS, 2012-002973-CFAWS, and
2012-002936-CFAWS, if he can do so in good faith.
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA, PALMER, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rigoberto Garcia v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rigoberto-garcia-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.