Rigney v. Tallmadge

19 Abb. Pr. 16
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1865·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Clerke, J.

The issuing of the execution was inconsistent with the whole tenor of the judgment. The receiver acquired title to all the property convéyed to Tallmadge; he alone can enforce the judgment.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rigney v. Tallmadge, 19 Abb. Pr. 16 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1865).

19 Abb. Pr. 16 (Rigney v. Tallmadge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Earl v. Brewer
248 A.D. 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)