Rigney v. Tallmadge
19 Abb. Pr. 16
This text of 19 Abb. Pr. 16 (Rigney v. Tallmadge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rigney v. Tallmadge, 19 Abb. Pr. 16 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1865).
Opinions
The issuing of the execution was inconsistent with the whole tenor of the judgment. The receiver acquired title to all the property convéyed to Tallmadge; he alone can enforce the judgment.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Earl v. Brewer
248 A.D. 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 Abb. Pr. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rigney-v-tallmadge-nysupct-1865.