Rigley v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Rigley v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 339, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1456

United States Customs Court·Decided June 26, 1952·No. No. 56776; protest 171439-K (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was established that when the husband of the plaintiff returned to the United States, he filed a baggage declaration in accordance with paragraph 1798, as amended, and section 10.17 (k), Customs Regulations of 1943, as amended by T. D. 52482, and was allowed by the collector to include therein the original rugs in question. In view of the fact that the baggage declaration was amended to include the oriental rugs in question under paragraph 1798, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was established that when the husband of the plaintiff returned to the United States, he filed a baggage declaration in accordance with paragraph 1798, as amended, and section 10.17 (k), Customs Regulations of 1943, as amended by T. D. 52482, and was allowed by the collector to include therein the original rugs in question. In view of the fact that the baggage declaration was amended to include the oriental rugs in question under paragraph 1798, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Rigley v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 339, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1456 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

29 Cust. Ct. 339 (Rigley v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.