Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/RIGHTMIRE v. State

RIGHTMIRE v. State

1 So. 3d 1191, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 775, 2009 WL 259359
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 5, 2009
Docket1D08-2144
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 So. 3d 1191 (RIGHTMIRE v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
RIGHTMIRE v. State, 1 So. 3d 1191, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 775, 2009 WL 259359 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

*1192 PER CURIAM.

Richard Rightmire challenges an order denying his motion for return of property seized during a criminal investigation. The trial court properly denied the motion as Rightmire’s appeal of his judgment of conviction was pending; however, now that the direct appeal has been resolved, Rightmire v. State, 987 So.2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), we now remand the case to the trial court below to reconsider the motion. See Davies v. State, 934 So.2d 606 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., and LAWRENCE, JR., L. ARTHUR, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luther Arthur Horn I I I v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016
Horn v. State
190 So. 3d 202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 So. 3d 1191, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 775, 2009 WL 259359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rightmire-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.