Righter v. Haines

64 A. 148, 73 N.J.L. 512, 1906 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 121
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 11, 1906
StatusPublished

This text of 64 A. 148 (Righter v. Haines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Righter v. Haines, 64 A. 148, 73 N.J.L. 512, 1906 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 121 (N.J. 1906).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garretson, J.

The defendant in error, Jennie E. N. Righter, administratrix of Washington Righter, brought suit [513]*513against Howard M. Haines, plaintiff in error, to recover certain rents collected by Haines. Haines was the agent- of Bighter to collect rents; he collected some of the rents in question during Bighter’s lifetime and some after Bighter’s death. It appeared upon the trial that the total amount of rents collected by Haines was $624, and upon this amount credits were to be allowed amounting to $459.19, leaving a balance due of $158.81, and for this amount the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff.

If the rents in question were derived from the property of Bighter, his administratrix could recover only such as accrued in his lifetime; the balance, which accrued after decedent’s death, belonged to the one entitled to the land of Bighter after his death.

In the absence of testimony showing that all the rents collected were assets of the estate of the deceased, it was error to direct a verdict.

We find no error in the proceedings by which the case came within the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas for trial.

The judgment below is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A. 148, 73 N.J.L. 512, 1906 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/righter-v-haines-nj-1906.