Riggs v. Tyson

1 N.J.L. 39
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1790·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On an abatement no costs are recoverable at law, (a) and this being an entire judgment, cannot be affirmed in part and reversed in part, (b) but must be reversed altogether.

Cited in Krumerick v. Krumerick, 2 Gr. 42.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riggs v. Tyson, 1 N.J.L. 39 (N.J. 1790).

1 N.J.L. 39 (Riggs v. Tyson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Commonwealth
2 Binn. 79 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1809)
Tibbs v. Brown
2 Grant 39 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1853)