Riggs v. State

381 S.W.3d 401, 2012 WL 4883245, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1300
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. ED 97385·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael A. Riggs appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing, from his guilty plea to first-degree robbery, armed criminal action, and unlawful possession of a firearm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Nesbitt v. State, 335 S.W.3d 67, 69 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for [402] their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riggs v. State, 381 S.W.3d 401, 2012 WL 4883245, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1300 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

381 S.W.3d 401 (Riggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nesbitt v. State
335 S.W.3d 67 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)