RIGGS v. JAMES

Ninth Circuit

RIGGS v. JAMES

470 F.2d 996, 32 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 73

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 22, 1972

DocketNos. 72-1483, 72-2311

StatusPublished

This text of 470 F.2d 996 (RIGGS v. JAMES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

RIGGS v. JAMES, 470 F.2d 996, 32 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 73 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F.Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal.1972).

We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F.Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal.1972).

We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

470 F.2d 996, 32 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggs-v-james-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack