RIGGS v. JAMES

Ninth Circuit

RIGGS v. JAMES

470 F.2d 996, 32 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 73

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 22, 1972·No. Nos. 72-1483, 72-2311·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F.Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal.1972).

We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F.Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal.1972).

We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.

RIGGS v. JAMES, 470 F.2d 996, 32 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 73 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

470 F.2d 996 (RIGGS v. JAMES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related