Riggs v. Graeff
20 F. Cas. 783, 2 D.C. 298, 2 Cranch 298
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 20 F. Cas. 783 (Riggs v. Graeff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Riggs v. Graeff, 20 F. Cas. 783, 2 D.C. 298, 2 Cranch 298 (circtddc 1822).
Opinion
(nem. con.) decided that the plaintiff could not support the action upon the special count, as no indemnity had been tendered, nor any demand made of a new bill. And, that as the defendant did not receive any value for the bill, but indorsed it only to give it credit, the plaintiff could not recover upon the count for money had and received.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Biggers v. Pace
5 Ga. 171 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1848)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 783, 2 D.C. 298, 2 Cranch 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggs-v-graeff-circtddc-1822.