Riggs v. Graeff
20 F. Cas. 783, 2 D.C. 298, 2 Cranch 298
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided April 15, 1822·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
(nem. con.) decided that the plaintiff could not support the action upon the special count, as no indemnity had been tendered, nor any demand made of a new bill. And, that as the defendant did not receive any value for the bill, but indorsed it only to give it credit, the plaintiff could not recover upon the count for money had and received.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riggs v. Graeff, 20 F. Cas. 783, 2 D.C. 298, 2 Cranch 298 (circtddc 1822).
20 F. Cas. 783 (Riggs v. Graeff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Biggers v. Pace
5 Ga. 171 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1848)