Riggs v. City of Florence
27 Kan. 194
This text of 27 Kan. 194 (Riggs v. City of Florence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Riggs v. City of Florence, 27 Kan. 194 (kan 1882).
Opinion
The judgment in this case must be affirmed, on the authority of Jansen v. The City of Atchison, 16 Kas. 384, because it nowhere appears that the city had any notice of the defect, or knowledge of facts sufficient to put it upon inquiry, long enough before the time of the injury to repair the bridge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of La Harpe v. Greer
85 P. 1015 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1906)
City of Pleasanton v. Rhine
54 P. 512 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
27 Kan. 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggs-v-city-of-florence-kan-1882.