Riggs v. Anderson
This text of 132 S.E.2d 312 (Riggs v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court did not err in nonsuiting plaintiffs. No memorandum or other instrument of writing containing the terms of the alleged offer and acceptance were signed by the parties or their attorneys or placed upon the minutes of the court, so far as the record on appeal discloses. Defendants accepted no part of the money tendered. A wholly unexecuted parol contract to sell land is void. Carpenter v. Yancey, 231 N.C. 160, 56 S.E. 2d 396; Kluttz v. Allison, 214 N.C. 379, 199 S.E. 395. A defense of the statute of frauds may be taken advantage of by general denial. Humphrey v. Faison, 247 N.C. [223]*223127, 100 S.E. 2d 524; 2 Strong: N. C. Index, Frauds, Statute of, s. 3, p. 389.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 S.E.2d 312, 260 N.C. 221, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggs-v-anderson-nc-1963.