Riggs v. Anderson

132 S.E.2d 312, 260 N.C. 221, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 650
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 18, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court did not err in nonsuiting plaintiffs. No memorandum or other instrument of writing containing the terms of the alleged offer and acceptance were signed by the parties or their attorneys or placed upon the minutes of the court, so far as the record on appeal discloses. Defendants accepted no part of the money tendered. A wholly unexecuted parol contract to sell land is void. Carpenter v. Yancey, 231 N.C. 160, 56 S.E. 2d 396; Kluttz v. Allison, 214 N.C. 379, 199 S.E. 395. A defense of the statute of frauds may be taken advantage of by general denial. Humphrey v. Faison, 247 N.C. [223]*223127, 100 S.E. 2d 524; 2 Strong: N. C. Index, Frauds, Statute of, s. 3, p. 389.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riggs v. Anderson, 132 S.E.2d 312, 260 N.C. 221, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 650 (N.C. 1963).

132 S.E.2d 312 (Riggs v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. Shore
197 S.E.2d 270 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)