Riggins v. Kelly
This text of 163 A.D.2d 912 (Riggins v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination that petitioner is guilty of violating inmate rules 106.10 (refusal to obey a direct order) and 100.11 (assault) is supported by substantial evidence. The Hearing Officer relied on the written misbehavior report in which the correction officer stated that petitioner failed to step into line and, "[ijnstead, he lowered his left shoulder and drove into me.” The Hearing Officer was entitled to credit the charging officer’s version and to reject that of petitioner (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 [913]*913NY2d 130). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 A.D.2d 912, 559 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggins-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1990.