Riggins v. Kelly

163 A.D.2d 912, 559 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9645
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 13, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 163 A.D.2d 912 (Riggins v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riggins v. Kelly, 163 A.D.2d 912, 559 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination that petitioner is guilty of violating inmate rules 106.10 (refusal to obey a direct order) and 100.11 (assault) is supported by substantial evidence. The Hearing Officer relied on the written misbehavior report in which the correction officer stated that petitioner failed to step into line and, "[ijnstead, he lowered his left shoulder and drove into me.” The Hearing Officer was entitled to credit the charging officer’s version and to reject that of petitioner (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 [913]*913NY2d 130). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matos v. Walker
191 A.D.2d 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 A.D.2d 912, 559 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggins-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1990.