Riggins v. Green
This text of Riggins v. Green (Riggins v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6812
ROMMELL A. RIGGINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KATHLEEN S. GREEN, Warden; VICTORIA BURKHARD, Asst. Warden; G. CHESTER, Captain; D. O. CULLOTTA; LATRICIA TAYLOR, H.O.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-02305-PJM)
Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 30, 2009
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rommell A. Riggins, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Rommell A. Riggins appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Riggins’ motion for appointment of counsel
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Riggins v. Green, No. 8:08-cv-02305-PJM (D. Md. Apr. 3, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Riggins v. Green, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggins-v-green-ca4-2009.