Riggins v. American Express Centurion Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Riggins v. American Express Centurion Bank

916 So. 2d 6, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8506, 2005 WL 1340260

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 8, 2005

DocketNo. 3D04-2620

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 916 So. 2d 6 (Riggins v. American Express Centurion Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riggins v. American Express Centurion Bank, 916 So. 2d 6, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8506, 2005 WL 1340260 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Because American Express properly accelerated the defendant’s outstanding balance by filing suit while she was admittedly in default, see Delandro v. America’s Mortgage Servicing, Inc., 674 So.2d 184, 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Pici v. First Union Nat’l Bank of Fla., 621 So.2d 732, 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), review denied, 629 So.2d 132 (Fla.1993); Parise v. Citizens Nat’l Bank, 438 So.2d 1020, 1022 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Cent. Home Trust Co. of Elizabeth v. Lippincott, 392 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); see also David v. Sun Fed’l Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 461 So.2d 93, 96 (Fla.1984), the summary judgment entered below in its favor is affirmed.

SHEPHERD, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because American Express properly accelerated the defendant’s outstanding balance by filing suit while she was admittedly in default, see Delandro v. America’s Mortgage Servicing, Inc., 674 So.2d 184, 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Pici v. First Union Nat’l Bank of Fla., 621 So.2d 732, 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), review denied, 629 So.2d 132 (Fla.1993); Parise v. Citizens Nat’l Bank, 438 So.2d 1020, 1022 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Cent. Home Trust Co. of Elizabeth v. Lippincott, 392 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); see also David v. Sun Fed’l Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 461 So.2d 93, 96 (Fla.1984), the summary judgment entered below in its favor is affirmed.

SHEPHERD, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

916 So. 2d 6, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8506, 2005 WL 1340260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggins-v-american-express-centurion-bank-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack