Riggin v. Balfour Owners Corp.

137 A.D.2d 799, 525 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1901
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 29, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 137 A.D.2d 799 (Riggin v. Balfour Owners Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riggin v. Balfour Owners Corp., 137 A.D.2d 799, 525 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

In an action to recover moneys paid as a transfer fee upon the sale of stock in a cooperative corporation, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.), dated December 15, 1986, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff challenges the exaction of a 6% transfer fee by the defendant cooperative corporation upon the closing of the sale and assignment of the plaintiffs shares in an apartment of the subject premises. The issue presented is whether the plaintiffs shares qualify as "unsold shares” which are exempted from the transfer fee by the terms of the corporate bylaws. The Supreme Court answered in the affirmative. We agree.

[800]*800The relevant provisions of the bylaws, proprietary lease, offering plan and amendment thereto, read together (see, Fe Bland v Two Trees Mgt. Co., 66 NY2d 556, 563; 330 W. End Apt. Corp. v Kelly, 66 NY2d 556, 563) present no question of fact and therefore were properly interpreted by the court as a matter of law (see, Mallad Constr. Corp. v County Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 32 NY2d 285). The proprietary lease and offering plan provide that "unsold shares” retain their character as such, regardless of transfer, until an individual purchases the same and actually occupies the apartment to which the shares are allocated. Inasmuch as the plaintiff or his family never occupied the apartment, the shares remained "unsold” and were therefore exempt from the transfer fee. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirrane v. Dunolly Gardens Owners Corp.
2019 NY Slip Op 3035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Schapira v. Grunberg
30 A.D.3d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Yatter v. Continental Owners Corp.
22 A.D.3d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Baranello v. Lehrberger
212 A.D.2d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Craig v. Riverview East Owners, Inc.
156 A.D.2d 157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 A.D.2d 799, 525 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggin-v-balfour-owners-corp-nyappdiv-1988.